Psychological safety is ‘‘a sense of confidence that the team will not embarrass, reject or punish someone for speaking up,’’ Edmondson wrote in a study published in 1999. ‘‘It describes a team climate characterized by interpersonal trust and mutual respect in which people are comfortable being themselves.’’ What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build… Continue reading What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team – NYTimes.com
What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team – NYTimes.com
Second, the good teams all had high ‘‘average social sensitivity’’ — a fancy way of saying they were skilled at intuiting how others felt based on their tone of voice, their expressions and other nonverbal cues. One of the easiest ways to gauge social sensitivity is to show someone photos of people’s eyes and ask… Continue reading What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team – NYTimes.com
What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team – NYTimes.com
As the researchers studied the groups, however, they noticed two behaviors that all the good teams generally shared. First, on the good teams, members spoke in roughly the same proportion, a phenomenon the researchers referred to as ‘‘equality in distribution of conversational turn-taking.’’ On some teams, everyone spoke during each task; on others, leadership shifted… Continue reading What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team – NYTimes.com
What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team – NYTimes.com
The researchers eventually concluded that what distinguished the ‘‘good’’ teams from the dysfunctional groups was how teammates treated one another. The right norms, in other words, could raise a group’s collective intelligence, whereas the wrong norms could hobble a team, even if, individually, all the members were exceptionally bright. What Google Learned From Its Quest… Continue reading What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team – NYTimes.com
Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
program is. A wellness program that’s actually about wellness would be entirely voluntary, not financially coercive. It wouldn’t collect any personal health information from employees. It wouldn’t weigh people or take their blood samples. It would be truly a benefit, not a cost-saving measure. It might reimburse employees for their gym or yoga studio memberships.… Continue reading Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
So what are employers actually after when they implement wellness programs tied to large financial incentives? Cost-shifting. Under the ACA, wellness programs are a legal way to shift a significant portion of the cost of premiums onto employees deemed unhealthy. Wellness programs don’t save money by preventing expensive medical claims—and in fact, they might even… Continue reading Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
What’s more, a 2013 meta-analysis of more than 7,000 studies found that a BMI in the overweight category was associated with lower mortality than a BMI in the “normal” range; only morbid obesity was associated with higher mortality. Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
Since 2010, companies have been able to shift up to 30 percent of the cost of employee-only health care premiums onto employees who fail wellness tests unrelated to tobacco, and up to 50 percent for failures related to tobacco. Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
But wellness programs promote medical tests of dubious value, encourage unnecessary doctor visits, and collect sensitive health information despite often extremely lax privacy policies, with little to no evidence that they improve health outcomes. Workplace Wellness Programs Are a Total Sham
Empowered Teams Can Make Decisions The Boss Disagrees With – Software People Inspiring
One such pattern that – once I noticed it – I realised is very prevalent in Agile Software Development is what I call the Empowered Straightjacket. Teams are “empowered” to make their own decisions, but when the boss doesn’t like a decision they’ve made, he or she overrules it. Those who remember their set theory… Continue reading Empowered Teams Can Make Decisions The Boss Disagrees With – Software People Inspiring